The 1930s began with
textile workers demanding wage increases, elimination of the hated "stretch-out
system" which increased workloads without corresponding increases in pay, an
eight-hour workday, and most of all, the right to organize and bargain
collectively. By the time Franklin Roosevelt entered the Presidency, the
industry was in shambles. Most of the problem was brought about by industry-wide
overproduction, which in turn resulted in lower profits for mill owners and
lower wages for mill workers. The industry, according to textile historian
Mildred Gwin Andrews, was "one of the sickest industries in the nation" and even
before Roosevelt's inauguration "government planning was under way to correct
wage and hour conditions in the textile industry."
President Roosevelt responded to the crisis by
forcing through Congress the National Industrial Recovery Act. Under its
sweeping grant of power, he established the National Recovery Administration
(NRA) on June 20, 1933, with Hugh Johnson as administrator. The NRA's
purpose, as noted by James Hodges, was clearly intended to promote self-rule of industry under federal
super-vision, to control
overproduction, to increase wages, control the hours of labor, and to stabilize
and then to raise
prices. The NRA was to accomplish these goals through the creation of codes of
fair competition which would
govern whole industries or trades.
A Cotton Textile
Committee, headed by George Sloan, was formed, and on July 17, 1933, its famous
Code No. 1 was adopted. The Code sought to restrict excessive production
and establish minimum wages and maximum hours. As required by law, it
incorporated the famous Section 7(a) of the NIRA providing that "employees shall
have the right to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of
their own choosing." The new Administration had high hopes
for the code; if effective in the textile industry, it could be a model for
bringing collective bargaining to coal miners and other industrial
workers.
Textile Code No. 1
never really got off the ground. The idea of permitting textile mill
owners, particularly Southern mill owners, to govern the industry was the
epitome of naiveté. Almost immediately, Southern mill owners began to
attack the wage and hour provisions, and mills, North and South, began to ignore
production restrictions and flood the market with over-production. Rather
quickly, it became clear that the mill owners, particularly Southern mill
owners, were incapable of acceptable self-rule and that they had no intent of
honoring the Section 7(a) provision for collective bargaining. The
few who tried to comply with 7(a) were "submerged amidst
massive violations of the measure" and could not stand under the pres-sure
wielded by the offenders. For the textile workers, James Hodges observed,
7(a) was like being invited to a fancy ball that they were too poor to
attend.
Textile workers, North
and South, began to protest that wages were too low for existence, that the
stretch-out was unbearable, and that they were not being permitted to bargain as
provided by Section 7(a) of the NIRA. As a result, the United Textile
Workers of America (UTWA) called for a special convention to consider a general
strike, and on August 30, 1934, Francis Gorman announced that all textile
workers throughout the United States would go on strike the next Monday.
The publicized reason was dissatisfaction with the Code, but the movement was really an effort to organize Southern cotton mills. For the
latter reason, the American Federation of Labor (AFL) assisted the UTWA through
the services of its organizers and state federations. Since Monday was
Labor Day, most of the work stoppage did not come until Tuesday, September
4.
The nation-wide strike was
poorly planned and under financed, but it began on schedule with the use of
union organizers, known as flying squadrons, moving rapidly in motorcades from
mill to mill to pressure, and in some cases, terrorize non-striking workers to
quit work. However, it was much more effective than mill owners had
expected, and within a few days, it was in full force from North to South with
450,000 of the 625,000 textile workers on strike.
The McComb Cotton Mill, just seven miles north
of Magnolia and the local union organization center, struck on Monday, September
3. But many of the Magnolia mill workers had ignored the strike order, and
within the next few days, several McComb union members visited Magnolia and
"gave the workers, who chose to ignore the nation-wide strike order, until
Monday to leave their jobs."
Sanders petitioned for an injunction to restrain McComb union members, or flying
squadrons, from interfering with the operation of the Magnolia mill. After
setting a hearing date, Judge C. W. Cutrer issued a temporary injunction with
the understanding that all parties would abide by a "gentlemen's agreement" that
there would be no further action or violence by either side in the
interim. The next night, Saturday, September 8, an estimated one hundred
members of the McComb local union visited Magnolia, distributed circulars in the
village, held a strike meeting, and threatened the Magnolia mill watchman with
death if he blew the whistle Monday morning. The activity of the McComb
union members, or flying squadrons, in Magnolia, ironically, worked to their
disadvantage because it justified the use of the National Guard.
Some violence had already
occurred. Fred (Bud) Smith, the mill superintendent, had shot and
seriously wounded Norman Crawford, one of the striking workers, and two workers
were badly beaten when they attempted to cross a picket line. With the threat of
more violence, Sheriff D. R. Statham wired Governor M. S. Conner:
There is likely to be serious trouble
at the cotton mill tomorrow
(Monday) and the means at my disposal are insufficient to maintain the peace. I
want you to
send the National
Guards to keep the peace. Monday morning, September 10,
the village people awakened to find themselves in the middle of an armed
military camp. James Rushing, fifteen years old at the time, recalls that
his mother Louise awakened him and his younger brother Jewel early that morning
to see the troops marching in the village.
Adjutant General Thomas Grayson had arrived
during the night with two hundred and twenty-five National Guard troops.
Machine guns, tear gas guns and bombs were set up in readiness on the mill roof
and at other vantage points, sentinels posted, and troops assigned to patrol the
mill grounds and streets. At noon, General Grayson returned to Jackson to
coordinate related activities throughout the state, leaving the troops at
Magnolia under the command of Colonel G. H. Snyder of Laurel and Major R. G.
Sexton of Meadville. The troops apparently quelled all threats of violence
as no bloodshed or significant strike-related incidents occurred after their
arrival.
On September 20,
General Grayson and members of his staff returned to McComb where they met
separately with representatives of the McComb Cotton Mill, a strikers committee,
and a citizens (or businessmen) committee. Between 250 and 300 businessmen
had petitioned the governor to send National Guard troops to protect workers who
desired to work. The textile workers, supported by four local Railroad
Brotherhoods, con- demned the action of the businessmen and petitioned the
governor not to send troops. Unlike the situation at Magnolia where
violence had occurred, Sheriff Statham felt that the McComb strike presented no
immediate danger and sided with the strikers. Grayson, after listening to
the various parties, decided not to bring National Guard troops to
McComb.
On Monday, September
24, two weeks after it started, the strike ended when President Roosevelt, after
promising to establish a Textile Labor Relations Board to study and handle labor
problems in the industry, asked that all workers return to work and that the
mill owners take them back without discrimination. By "2 o'clock Monday
afternoon the last of the khaki-clad warriors in Magnolia had been relieved of
duty and military occupation of the cotton mill village was an incident of the
past." The Magnolia and McComb mills quietly opened without incident, and
the nation-wide textile strike of 1934, the largest single strike in the history
of the country, was over.
The McComb Cotton Mill employees, however, struck again the next day, the fourth
time in less than a year, when an employee was not allowed to return to work on
charges of intoxication. The dispute was settled later the same
day.
During the general
strike, National Guard troops were also dispatched to the Stonewall and
Kosciusko mill villages. Like Magnolia, machine guns, tear gas guns and
bombs were set up in readiness on the mill roofs and at other vantage points,
and troops set up camp on the mill grounds and patrolled the streets. The
Kosciusko-Attala Historical Society reported:
We experienced a new and tense situation in our
town in August and
September--a strike at Aponaug Manufacturing Company. Because of threatened violence
and sabotage, Sheriff Blanton
requested that National Guardsmen be sent here for the protection of the million dollar
cotton mill. One hundred
twenty-five guardsmen, along with their machine guns, gas bombs, tents, etc., arrived and
set up camp on the mill
grounds. Citizens of the county generally welcomed the coming of the guardsmen who
have so completely dominated
the situation as to scare away all threatened violence. Though this episode
was naturally exciting to our
young people, the town was very thankful when, after a short time, things settled back
to normal. At Koscuisko, Sanders requested the use of
National Guard troops to remove some twenty-seven families from their village
homes. He argued that the family heads were union agitators, and for that
reason, he had right to force them from their village homes. Governor
Conner quickly and publicly denied the request. It is worth noting that the Berthadale Cotton
Mill in McComb was not affected by the nation-wide strike; its employees
continued to work throughout the strike. A. K. and Lober Landau, the
owners, were known for their fair treatment of workers and, as a result,
benefited from the unusually good employer/employee relations. Recall the
July 4th barbacue and brass band provided by A. K. Landau at Magnolia in the
early twenties.
The Magnolia
mill had been reopened only two years when the strike occurred, and
understandably many of the workers opposed the strike. At its beginning,
several workers sent a petition to the governor indicating
that they were not affiliated with the Union,
desired to continue work and
requesting the Governor to
afford them protection from intimidation or violence. Governor
Conner replied that under the law he could not send out the National Guard
unless advised by the sheriff that the situation was serious and that he could
not handle it. The sheriff's subsequent wire apparently satisfied that
requirement as the governor quickly dispatched troops.
The National Guardsmen in Magnolia were highly
commended by all who came in contact with them and were given credit for keeping
the peace. After it was over, Colonel Snyder, a more relaxed commander,
said that the soldiers had a good time while on duty in Magnolia, and that "they
mingled freely with the people of the community, and some of the boys made warm
friendships, particularly with Magnolia girls." The mayor, many of the
merchants, and some of the mill workers sent letters of appreciation to the
governor.
In spite of their
best efforts, however, tragedy struck the village three days after the strike on
September 27. Alice Bernice Sullivan, the two-year old daughter of Bill
Sullivan, a mill worker, was killed while playing with her young brother Robert
and companion Trelles Case at a small house next door to the mill. The two
boys, each about four years old, played near the house as Alice found her way
under it. She unfortunately found a shotgun, believed to have been left by
a striking employee, and discharged it when she pulled on the barrel. The
death of Alice Bernice became a reference point in time for the village people,
they all remember the strike in which the "little Sullivan girl" was
killed.
The nation-wide strike
was not successful from the union's point of view. Sanders, along with
other Southern mill owners, won as the strike failed to bring either labor
organization or collective bargaining to the Southern textile industry. In
her book The Men and the Mills, Mildred Gwin Andrews concludes that
there was really no "settlement" of
the strike. It wore itself out
and strikers, most of whom did not belong to any union and who did not know why
they had gone on strike,
gradually returned to work.
While there was no formal
agreement, there was a "settlement" of sorts. It was really a retreat for
the union, leaving Southern mill owners free to misinterpret and misapply the
collective bargaining provisions of Section 7(a) of the NRA. Many of them,
unfortunately, took advantage of amspanuities in the law, but to make matters
worse, the Supreme Court in May of 1935 struck down the NRA, leaving the
industry virtually unregulated until passage of the Fair Labors Standard Act in
1938.
Shortly after the death
of the NRA in May of 1935, the National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act) of 1935
reinstated the right of workers in interstate commerce to organize and bargain
collectively. Many Southern mill owners, however, routinely and repeatedly
ignored the new law by discharging union sympathizers and even closing plants to
prevent collective bargaining. Southern workers, Mississippians in
particular, were reluctant to press the issue or even openly complain;
unorganized workers were not inclined to join the union in a fight against the
mill owners with long lines waiting at the gates for employment.
In any event the General Strike of
1934 was a failure, and it is doubtful that the failure could have been
avoided. From the beginning, unionism was weak in the South, and the depth
of the Depression made it extremely difficult to organize workers at the small
privately held Southern mills. The failure, according to James Hodges, was
"a dramatic example of the limits of New Deal labor policy." It was a
devastating blow to the South where, as a result of the failure, unions in all
Southern industries retreated, and the South fell behind the rest of the nation
"in the quest for effective unionization and collective bargaining."
Milton Derber, in Labor and the New
Deal, argued that the failure of textile unionism had an epidemic effect
throughout the South, particularly in the smaller towns and villages, where its
leading industries--lumber, furniture, chemicals, and food-processing--were
hardly touched by union organization dur- ing the New Deal period.
Historian Bill Wyche observed that textiles represented the leading industry in
the South, “and that historically and universally the industry had over-expanded
and overproduced; and, as a means of maintaining lower production costs,
Southern textile manufacturers vigorously resisted unionization which could lead
to higher wages.” In any event, the Sanders mills came out of the strike
with far fewer union sympathizers and no known union members.
Sanders mill workers, like other Southern mill
workers, used the 1934 rebellion as an immediate protest against the low wages,
long hours, and the abusive stretch-out, but, unfortunately, they were
influenced too much by their rural customs and traditions--including the
ingrained individualism, the pov- erty, the apathy, and the suspicions of
northern unions moving southward--and failed to see the long-range benefits of
acting collectively. Mississippi, even though the poorest state in the
union, clearly was not ready for unionization, collective bargaining or, for
that matter, industrialization in 1934.
Two years after the strike, Hugh White, the
newly elected governor, tried to attract industry by launching a development
program, called Balancing Agriculture with Industry (BAWI), but the program did
not address the lingering anti-union attitude and was doomed to failure from the
start. As discussed ear-lier, Governor White attempted to mediate at the
Tupelo Cotton Mill strike in April 1937, but he was ineffective in bringing the
parties together, because, partially at least, of the pre- vailing anti-union
atti-tude in the community.
The failure to deal with the anti-labor attitude was devastating; the state, as
a consequence, continued to lag far behind the nation and its sister states and
made no significant move toward industrialization until President Roosevelt,
concerned about the state's wide-spread poverty, used his influence during World
War II to bring several war plants and military establishments to the
state. Ironically, the curtailment of unionism in the state not only
stifled industrial development, but, as I will show later, contributed to the
demise of its cotton mill industry in the early 1950s. The anti-union
attitude permitted Sanders Industries to rely too much on low wages, long hours,
and the abusive stretch-out system, which in the long run contributed to the
flight of textile workers from the Sanders mills to jobs in other industries,
providing better pay and better working conditions.
Chapter X
Mills
& Villages: Depression Years
The strike failure and the
absence of adequate protective labor legislation left Southern mill owners,
including Sanders, free to dominate the industry. Like the plantation
owners before them, the powerful Southern mill owners and other Southern elite
were in a position to effectively dominate the white mill workers who too often
huddled together and accepted the difficult working conditions that included low
wages, long hours, shoddy housing, and a burdensome workload under the
stretch-out system. There were no other industrial jobs available to
them; thus the only alternative for most was the hard and isolated life of
tenant or share crop farming.
After the strike the stretch-out system continued to be used by mill owners,
particularly Southern mill owners, to re- duce labor costs. Its wide and
extensive use made it, accord- ing to historian James Hodges, "the one issue
which most concerned textile workers, much more than wages and other working
conditions." He cites the case of a worker forced to resign because of the
burdensome workload, who told his general manager "that to work under it was the
same as committing suicide."
Sanders apparently used the dreaded system at most, if not all, of his mills
throughout the thirties. Several former Sanders workers recall that the
practice was often a topic of conversation. Using the non-Sanders mill at
Tupelo as a comparison, a former worker said that the workload at the Sanders
mills at Magnolia, Kosciusko, Meridian, and Winona was far greater; and using
the non-Sanders mill at McComb as a standard, another said that the workload at
the Sanders mills at Kosciusko, Magnolia, Meridian, and Natchez was greater.
Others agreed these assessments and said that it was common knowledge that the
stretch-out system was used, but added that, while the workers discussed the
heavy workloads among themselves, few dared to complain to their
supervisor.
Most workers felt
that Robert Sanders had little empathy for the struggling mill workers; they
considered him to be arrogant, domineering, and selfish in his relations with
them. But as expected, most concealed their feelings out of fear of losing
both a job and a house; for the individual worker, the fear may have been
justified for there was always someone waiting in line to replace him.
Sanders's opposition to labor organizations and collective
bargaining was well known; he used it effectively to control his mill workers throughout the Depression years. Workers
suspected of involvement in union activities were often summarily
dismissed. It appears, however, the dismissals were usually temporary
unless avid agitators were involved. Ella Chadwick recalls that several
co-workers persuaded her to ask for a pay raise, and that when she did, she was
fired instantly. But after a few days of pleading, she was rehired to work
the night shift. A mixture of harshness and compassion.
On one occasion. Sanders reportedly denied a
request for an increase in pay with the retort that "a house and a dollar a day
is sufficient for a mill worker." Consistent with that view, General
Superintendent G. M. Tidwell later reduced the pay by ten percent at the
Magnolia mill, and not hearing of any serious opposition, imposed an-other
reduction the next day. One worker recalls that he was a victim of the
consecutive pay decreases and that his father was present and heard the
dollar-a-day statement. No one was surprised; Tidwell was known by the
workers to be ambitious and eager to play the role of hatchet man. It was
just another of his overzealous acts.
The
Sanders mills, including the Magnolia mill, were noto- rious for long workdays,
low wages, and burdensome workloads. As late as 1939 Sanders, as will be
discussed later, was still fighting the implementation of the first minimum wage
and forty-hour week law (FLSA of 1938) when most of the industry was already
paying more than the minimum wage. But the harsh treat- ment of employees was
not limited to low wages and long hours; workers were not expected, for example,
to complain about on-the-job personal injuries.
Lester Rushing learned the cost of complaining when he in
1938 suffered permanent injuries to his foot while working in the Magnolia mill
and, being unable to negotiate a settlement, initiated a civil action for
damages. The court awarded him a trifling amount, most of which went
to his lawyers, but the Magnolia mill was not to pay any amount without
retaliating. Rushing and his spouse, along with three brothers and their
spouses, were summarily dismissed; and the four families, with several children
between them, were forced to vacate their vil- lage homes and move on in the
midst of the lingering depression. Ironically, the four families moved to
other Sanders mills at Meridian and Kosciusko, and after a brief absence, the
Drew Rushing family returned to the Magnolia mill. Another example of
mixing harshness and compassion.
Oppressive working conditions during the
Depression years were not unique to the Sanders mills but were bad in the tex-
tile industry throughout the country, and people everywhere reluctantly accepted
it, made the best of the situation, pulled together, and went on with their
lives. The Sanders village peole, including those at Magnolia, felt
fortunate just to have jobs, for several million people throughout the country
were unemployed. As people generally do in a crisis, they bonded together
to find and share some good times in their personal lives, and in the process,
the good times strengthened their will to survive and, in the end, over-shadowed
the oppressive working conditions in the mills.
Like other Sanders mill people, Magnolia
village people found the time to enjoy social and recreational activities. For
the women and young girls, the little Nazarene Church was the center of the
social and community activities; for the men and young boys, there was hunting,
fishing, and baseball. For the family, radio provided enter-tainment as members,
often with friends and neighbors, crowded around it to listen to their favorite
programs such as Lum and Abner, Amos 'n' Andy, Inner Sanctum, Gene Autry,
Superman, Don Winslow of the Navy, Roy Rogers, Hopalong Cassidy, The Lone
Ranger, and The Grand Ole Opry. The Magnolia cinema was a span attraction,
Saturday afternoons featured cowboy movies for the young, and Saturday nights
had late shows for the older crowd.
At the Minnehaha River, a popular swimming
hole, jokingly referred to by the boys as "Peter Deep" and the girls as "Deeper
Peep," attracted both boys and girls. The loud chatter or laughter of
girls approach-ing the swimming hole would alert the boys and usually sent some
scampering for their clothes.
Everyone recalls that Sunday was the span day in the village with church in the
morning, followed by a traditional Southern Sunday dinner, typically fried
chicken or round steak with rice and gravy, fried corn or fried okra, lima beans
or black-eyed peas, sliced tomatoes, hot biscuits or cornbread, and blackberry
or peach cobbler or banana pudding for des-sert. The vitals remain popular
today and are fondly referred to as "soul food."
After the week's heartiest midday meal, the
younger children usually went out to play ball or marbles in the church yard or
for a swim at "Peter Deep." Older teenagers often simply strolled in small
groups about the village, town, or cemetery and at times gathered at the
Minnehaha River bridge where they talked, laughed, joked, and counted cars with
out-of-state license plates as they passed on U. S. Highway 51 enroute to
seemingly far away places at the time, either New Orleans a hundred miles south
or Memphis three hundred miles north. The dream was to go to one or the
other some day.
Like teenagers
across the country during the Depression, Magnolia village teenagers were
creative and expert at improvising games and toys. Thread from the mill
was used to make softballs; discarded iron gears became wheels for wagons; and
roller skate wheels were used to make scooters. Old tires were made into
swings, but as often, simply paddled along the street by young boys, sometimes
with a small boy curled inside. Discarded inner-tubes made excellent
floats for swimmers or, if they could not hold air, could be used to make
slingshots. Homemade kites, especially the "skeeter kites," were very
popular. The skeeter kite was easy to make; two slender pieces of straw or
weed stems were simply crossed and pierced through the corners of a sheet of
tablet paper. With a bobbin of light-weight thread from the spinning room,
it could be put out of sight within minutes.
The Magnolia village grade school played an
important role in the community. It was near the center of the village and
within four blocks of its outer limits, and thus the short distance avoided the
transportation problem that would have prevailed had the youngsters been
required to attend the town school. Limiting the school to the first four
grades turned out to be a substantial benefit because, unlike Kosciusko with its
eight grades, Magnolia village children had more opportunity to interact with
town children. After four years at the village grade school, they attended
the town school where they competed and interacted with others on an equal
basis. Some of the boys went on to excel in basketball and football,
including Billy Parker, Charles Robinson, James Rushing, Steve Case, and Pat
Fuller; while Betty Jean Shaw, Eddie Virginia Case, Edna Earl Goff, Evelyn
Rushing, and Beatrice Morgan excelled at basketball. Betty Jean, Eddie
Virginia, along with Laura Mae Case and Bernice Rushing, also became popular
cheerleaders.
After being
closed for a few years, the Magnolia village school reopened in 1935 with Miss Auline Coney Swearingen as one of two teachers. She had taught at the
school before it closed in 1926 and often referred to the village children as
"my kids." Some of her students in the 1920s included James Rushing,
Clifton Lamkin, William Sullivan, Laverne Case, Robert Case, James Alford, Tom
Fancher, Mildred McCaskill, Paul Case, Elmer Parker, and William
McCaskill. Later students of the 1930s included Walter Lamkin, Bertrand
Pugh, Robert Goff, Fred Sullivan, Leon Morgan, Hubert Parker, Doris Parker,
James Earl Davis, Houston Parker, Johnnie Carl Rushing, Ethelene Chanell,
Bernice Rushing, Geneva Chanell, Donnis Parker, Hazel Parker, Halbert Chanell,
Bertie Goff, Rufus Morgan, A. D. Alford, Nona Fancher, Lucien Lamkin, James
Alton Rushing, Herbert Randall, Robert Pezant, Helen Rushing, Willia Dean
Sullivan, Laverne Richmond, William Earl Phurrough, Ethel Mae Dickinson, Benny
Chanell, Avis Pugh, Janelle Taylor, Tommie Etta Dickinson, Norma Case, W. M.
Ravencraft, Ollie McCaskill, Grace Westmoreland, Helen Richmond, Louise Fuller,
Mavis Anderson, Othar Chisolm, James Chisolm, Billy Parker, June Taylor, Pat
Fuller, Marvin Randall, Robert Sullivan, E. J. Westmoreland, Pauline Fuller,
Trelles Case, Doris Pugh, Ralph Loggins, Robert Lamkin, W. L. Case, Lillian
Chanell, Maurice Pugh, James Case, Betty Jean Shaw, and Evelyn Rushing.
There were, no doubt, others who attended the school.
The Magnolia village school was again
discontinued in 1938, and in spite of the greater distance to school, its closing surely benefited the children by integrating them into the town
school. There were, however, anxious moments when the first class entered
the town school. Doris (Pugh) Case, who was in that class, indicates that
the teachers at first opposed their admission on grounds of insufficient
room. Miss Auline Swearingen, the village school teacher, apparently
defused the explosive situation. Willa Dean Sullivan recalls that Miss
Swearingen calmed everyone by accompanying "her kids" to the town school and
introducing them to their new classmates. Miss Swearingen made a lasting
impression on her kids, and today, six decades later, her former students fondly
reminisce and relate anecdotes about her. Two village girls, one born in
the late thirties and the other in the early forties, were named in her honor,
Auline Sullivan and Auline Strickland.
The crime rate in rural America during the
thirties was minimal, but for Magnolia and its mill village, it was virtual- ly
non-existent. Without any fear, houses could be left unlocked and bicycles
unattended for extended periods of time at the school or in front of the picture
show. Several people recall the thirties as a period of tranquility, and
no one recalls a serious violent crime of any type or a burglary or a robbery in
the village. One village resident, who will remain nameless, was mentioned
as an occasional chicken thief and another was accused of stealing firewood, but
they were generally excused because of the hard times. Perhaps the worst
transgression was that on payday some of the men occasionally drank too much,
shot craps, and a few had fist-fights, but come Monday morning, all was
forgotten. Robert Sullivan recalls that Mississippi was a dry state at the
time, and that local humorists suggested "it will remain dry as long as
Mississippians can stagger to the polls." It was the one issue that
brought the churches and bootleggers together, for neither wanted a wet state
and both went all out in an effort to keep it dry.
The Magnolia mill, in addition to the church
building and the four-year grade school, made sure the villagers had medical
care. Two doctors, G. W. Robertson and J. D. Smith, provided the
care. Patients were generally treated in the doctor's office but house
calls were also made. In fact, it was a common sight to see the doctors
walking the village streets, stopping here and there to check on their
patients. In the late thirties, a small fee of twenty-five cents weekly
was deducted from each worker's pay and divided between the two doctors for
their services. The fee also covered medical procedures performed by the
doctors at the small Magnolia Hospital which were limited, primarily to an
occasional appendectomy, tonsillectomy, attending a broken bone or stitching a
skin laceration. Beulah Mae Bird, plant secretary at the time, confirmed
that the workers were required to participate in the program and share in its
cost.
Rememnsing about life on the Magnolia village
during the 1930s, Dr. Trelles Case summarized the feelings of most vil- lagers
in his statement that "we might have been poor, but the village was made up of
good and caring people." Others supported his assessment; many remember the
village as an extended family with people doing for each other, setting up with
the sick or giving poundings of food and clothing to those in need. They were
bound by an unwritten code to care for each other in times of need, and this
camaraderie surely gave them strength in facing the hard times of the depression
years.
Roosevelt's "New Deal" finally came to the textile
industry in the late thirties: it was a great turning point for the Sanders mill
workers as it was to bring about sweeping changes and improvements in working
conditions. In 1939, the Textile Industry Committee accepted America's
first wage and hour law (FLSA of 1938); it provided for a minimum wage of 32.5
cents per hour, a 40-hour week, and a minimum age of 16 years for child
labor. Most of the industry was in fact already paying more than the
minimum, but Sanders, paying far less, joined Opp Mills of Alabama in seeking an
injunction against the enforcement of the new law.
The U. S. Supreme Court, in Opp Cotton Mills,
Inc. v. Administrator, upheld the law which "put a floor under wages and a cap
on the hours of the normal working day." The decision simply required
Sanders to pay the wages most Southern cotton mills were already paying, and,
contrary to the expressed fears of the Sanders and Opp mill owners, neither
owner found it necessary to close a mill because of the new wage
regulations. It was to be Robert Sanders's last major battle with
labor.
Mill workers at the
several Sanders mills were ecstatic. For them, the decision upholding the
minimum wage and 40-hour week law was the fulfillment of a long dream.
After more than a hundred years of long hours, sunup to sundown in the industry,
the 40-hour week had finally arrived. Wages were to start at 32.5 cents
per hour, increased to 37.5 cents per hour in June 1941, to 40 cents in April
1942, and finally to 45 cents still later. The new law came on the eve of
World War II (1939-1945) which was to bring great prosperity to the Sanders
mills and, in turn, many opportunities and benefits to the mill workers.
By the beginning of the war, things
had already started to change. Claude McDade had been promoted from
weave room supervisor to superintendent and plant-employee relations were
improving. It was apparent that McDade, who knew the workers and their
families intimately, was given substantial latitude in dealing with their
needs. For example, McDade made himself available every Saturday morning
for workers in need of salary advances. Not having cash on hand, he would
give the worker a handwritten note to deliver to the Corner Drugstore.
Fred Andrews, the druggist, would give the worker the two or three dollars and
payment was then deducted from his next payday. It was a good arrangement
for the druggist because he was assured of quick payment of the loan along with
all other charges.
In hardship
cases, payment for house rent was often waived for extended periods of
time. A prime example involved the widow of Charlie Case, a faithful
employee of many years. After his death, his widow Laura, elderly and
unable to work in the mill, remained in her village house until she died several
years later without the mention of house rent. Rose Pressley was a similar
case; there were others. While it did not make up for the low wages and
long hours, the paternalistic benevolence surly left the workers with a sense of
well-being and security.
The Depression years had been
hard, but life on the Magnolia and other Sanders villages was about the same as,
if not better than, that of most Mississippians. Indeed, times were bad
for everyone, but the village people were at least gainfully employed and had
money to spend. In 1940, near the end of the Depression, Mississippi was
still tied to an ailing agricultural economy with 80 percent of its inhabitants
still living in the country. Reviewing the period, Dunbar Rowland, former Director of
Mississippi Department of Archives and History, concluded that:
The Second World War was the watershed of
modern Mississippi
history. Before it there was institutional continuity streaking back 100 years. After
it nothing remained the
same. This is not to say that World War II was the cause of all change, but it is a
convenient dividing
line.... Since the beginning of World War II every one of Mississippi's long-cherished
institutions has been destroyed. King Cotton has lost its throne.... Everywhere mechanization and
diversification have triumphed. ...Perhaps even more important, agriculture has
lost its primacy in
Mississippi's economy. No longer is it the chief employer and income producer.
Manufacturing now employees
more workers and produces more income than does
agriculture.
By 1940 the United States, responding to
threats of war, had begun to mobilize its resources and prepare for war.
The economic stimulus, provided by the massive military buildup, brought the
Great Depression to an abrupt end. Suddenly, Mississippi, along with its
textile industry, was in the threshold of its greatest change in history.
Thanks to Roosevelt's influence, several war plants and military establishments,
with new and higher paying jobs, would come to the South, especially
Mississippi, and compete with the textile plants in industrializing
Mississippi. Mill workers at all Sanders textile mills, including
Magnolia, would be affected and their lives changed forever.
Sanders Industries, except for the Natchez,
Winona, and Yazoo City mills, had survived the Great Depression. It had
survived the hard times that forced hundreds of less fortunate cotton mills
throughout the country to either close or operate in bankruptcy. Since the
peak year of 1910, Mississippi had closed seventeen mills by either liquidation
or fire, reducing Mississppi's cotton manufacturing to only eight mills by 1942
and the beginning of the war years (see Table 3). Sanders Industries
controlled five of them--the Kosciusko, Magnolia, Meridian, Starkville, and West
Point mills. The three non-Sanders mills were the Stonewall Cotton Mill,
the Laurel Cotton Mill, and the Alden Spinning Mill in Meridian.
Obviously, the Mississippi cotton textile industry was near collapse at the
beginning of the forties, but World War II would give it breath and life for a
few more years.
Table 3. MISSISSIPPI MILLS CLOSED, 1910-1942
Name
Location
Date
Mississippi
Mills
Wesson
1910
Port Gibson
Mills Port
Gibson 1910
Batesville Yarn
Mill
Batesville
1910
Columbus Yarn
Mill
Columbus
1910
Tomspanbee
Mills
Columbus
1910
Noxubee
Mills
Shuqualak
1911
Mississippi Textile
School
Starkville
1914
Bellevue
Mills
Moorhead
1924
Yocona
Mills
Water Valley *1929
Natchez Cotton
Mills
Natchez
1934
Rosalie Cotton
Mills
Natchez
1934
Tupelo Cotton
Mills
Tupelo
1937
Yazoo Cotton
Mills Yazoo
City *1937
Berthadale Cotton
Mills
McComb
1938
Winona Cotton
Mills
Winona
*1940
McComb Cotton
Mills
McComb
1942
* Mills destroyed by fire and not reopened.
Chapter XI &
Biblography
Return to
Index
©
2006-present. All rights reserved. This information may be used by libraries,
genealogical societies, or other genealogical researchers. Commercial use of
this information strictly prohibited without prior written permission from
owner. If copied, this copyright notice must appear with the
information.